Nitke v. Gonzales

» Political » Prudes & Puritans » S&M / BDSM

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal from a photographer who says her right to free speech means she can put pictures of sadomasochistic sex on the Web.

High Court Lets Ruling Stand Against Web Sex Images

Justices were told by attorney John Wirenius of New York that if they turned down the case, “many more Internet users will likely face the constitutionally unsupportable choice faced by Ms. Nitke: either to censor her published images or risk prosecution.”

Justices Pass on Internet Obscenity Case

Your feelings?

Please share your feelings about Nitke v. Gonzales. Please stick to the topic of the entry. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard

Comments

Other Entries


Bookmark Sex is Funny


Sex is Funny
Index
Political , Prudes & Puritans , S&M / BDSM
Nitke v. Gonzales
Top of page