Nitke v. Gonzales

» Political , » Prudes & Puritans , » S&M / BDSM

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal from a photographer who says her right to free speech means she can put pictures of sadomasochistic sex on the Web.

High Court Lets Ruling Stand Against Web Sex Images

Justices were told by attorney John Wirenius of New York that if they turned down the case, “many more Internet users will likely face the constitutionally unsupportable choice faced by Ms. Nitke: either to censor her published images or risk prosecution.”

Justices Pass on Internet Obscenity Case

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Nitke v. Gonzales. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard

Elsewhere

    • The first affordable sex machine worth owning.
      This fucking machine is the smallest, handiest, most versatile handheld device for an affordable price. Exciting hands-free multi-speed solo sex. The device is lightweight, quiet, safe and feels fantastic.