Total Male Orgasm Denial?

rare or never as far as male orgasms are concerned as they make us lazy!

If orgasms make someone lazy, then that submission is coming from the crotch, not the heart. (not that there’s anything wrong with that, but it’s important to know yourself.)

In these comments, Victoria Catherine is making major generalizations which aren’t true for everybody. Saying that not having orgasms is a man’s “place” is no different than saying “a woman’s place is in the kitchen”. It’s simply more sexist bullshit.

It’s odd that many femdom sites see misogynistic views as evil, yet misandry is often tolerated, even championed. Can you say “hypocricy”, boys and girls?

She’s really quite good-natured about it all.

I don’t know if her belief is literal or an attitude she enjoys within her role or - well I’m just not sure.

Us Tantrists believe that ejaculatory denial (not to be confused with orgasm denial) is pivotal for sexual optimization. The bodily function of ejaculation does render the body and mind to function sluggishly. I also believe that the aimless spilling of one’s seed can drain a man of his vitality in the long run.

Yet, I still don’t know if I like the idea of someone forcing a man to refrain from cumming. I feel that best way to achieve the ultimate goal is through self-discipline.

My heaviest periods of masturbation - 5 times a day - never seemed to diminish me in any way.

D/s relationships that include 100% chastity seem pretty dubious to me. There are plenty of men who have that as a fantasy. Luckily for them there are very few women who really want to do that to a man.

Orgasm denial or at least regulation is far more common than many people know. The adult toy stores sell lots of those chastity belts like the CB-3000.

But these are often to couples in otherwise vanilla relationships. The guy feels energized by being forced to go without cumming for a time and the resultant sex when the device is removed is better for both partners.

There is something sexy about wearing the chastity belts and climax regulation. While in a body worship session, I like to avoid any penile attention, but let my hunger manifest in other ways. Giving complete devotion while denying yourself is Christ-like. (lol) But I still prefer the regulation to be a product of self-discipline and not of manipulation.

Chastity devices are probably the most popular part of female dominant relationships. The appeal is probably literal physical inability.

While I’ve never worn one of these things it would work better for me than will power. But for an odd reason. Self-denial would not be that difficult for me in the right context. But if I were to do it purely by self-control I suspect my libido would strongly diminish. Hardly the goal. A device would allow me to eroticize it.

I am curiously attracted to the concept of orgasm control/denial and the CB3000, but only for spicing up the typical vanilla relationship and only for perhaps only a week at a time ( I really don’t know as I have not discussed it with her yet..)

Self denial is, in my opinion, more erotic because you still have the freedom to have erections, leak fluids, and subtly move to induce pleasure.

I find myself subconsciously winding my hips and desperately grazing the head of my cock against anything I can find. I find my libido magnified by this brand of chasity.

Naturally you would prefer what works for you. The guys who get more satisfaction from a male chastity device prefer that. It isn’t as if there is any right or wrong way to engage in the practice as long as it is satisfying.

For me one of the biggest turn ons. Many years ago a Lady I was seeing simply informed me quite innocently, ‘It’s not necessary for you to cum’. Guess She had a point.