Sexy Dancing for Fun Not Protected by First Amendment

» Crime & Punishment

If you are a professional stripper erotic gyrations are fine. But if you dance lasciviously just because you enjoy it then the constitution doesn’t protect you.

“Most forms of dance, whether ballet or striptease, when performed for the benefit of an audience, are considered expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment,” Judge William Traxler wrote for the panel, affirming a lower court’s decision. “Willis, however, was not a performer in any meaningful sense — she was simply dancing for her own enjoyment.”

Judge says only pros allowed to dance dirty

Your feelings?

Please share your feelings about Sexy Dancing for Fun Not Protected by First Amendment. Please stick to the topic of the entry. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard

Comments

Other Entries








Bookmark Sex is Funny


Sex is Funny
Index
Crime & Punishment
Sexy Dancing for Fun Not Protected by First Amendment
Top of page