Sexy Dancing for Fun Not Protected by First Amendment

» Crime & Punishment

If you are a professional stripper erotic gyrations are fine. But if you dance lasciviously just because you enjoy it then the constitution doesn’t protect you.

“Most forms of dance, whether ballet or striptease, when performed for the benefit of an audience, are considered expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment,” Judge William Traxler wrote for the panel, affirming a lower court’s decision. “Willis, however, was not a performer in any meaningful sense — she was simply dancing for her own enjoyment.”

Judge says only pros allowed to dance dirty

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Sexy Dancing for Fun Not Protected by First Amendment. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard

Elsewhere

    • The first affordable sex machine worth owning.
      This fucking machine is the smallest, handiest, most versatile handheld device for an affordable price. Exciting hands-free multi-speed solo sex. The device is lightweight, quiet, safe and feels fantastic.